- Home»
- School Information»
- Statutory Information»
- Pupil Premium 2024-25»
- Pupil Premium Funding REVIEW 2017-18»
Pupil Premium Funding REVIEW 2017-18
Impact and Statutory Data
PUPIL PREMIUM BUDGET
Pupil premium is additional funding for schools to support them in raising the attainment of disadvantaged pupils of all abilities and to diminish the difference between them and their peers.
For 2017/18 the Government have allocated £1320 per pupil for deprivation, £300 per pupil for service children and £1900 per pupil for post looked after children.
Total Funding 2017/18 |
£54,560 |
---|---|
Number on Roll |
312 |
Number of Pupil Premium children |
34 |
BARRIERS TO LEARNING INCLUDE:
- The amount of support that is available at home.
- Language and communication skills.
- A lack of self-confidence, low aspiration including attendance.
- Sometimes behavioural difficulties and needs.
- Complex family situations that affect how well a child flourishes. (This can sometimes be for a short period of time but can also be long running and stressful for the child.)
- Multiple aspects of disadvantage including specific learning difficulties, special educational needs.
Attendance Data
Attendance 2017/18 |
Persistent absence (missing 10% or more of sessions) |
|
---|---|---|
Pupil Premium (30) |
93.2% |
5.5% (18 children) |
Non Pupil premium (296) |
96.6% |
4.1% (12 children) |
All pupils (326) |
96.2% |
20% (6 children) |
Statutory Data
School Pupil Premium Data 2018 |
All Children Nationally 2018 |
|
---|---|---|
GLD (4 chn) |
75% |
72%
|
Y1 Phonics (3 chn) |
66% |
82% |
Y2 Phonics (6 chn) |
100% |
91.9% |
End of KS1 (4 children)
|
Reading - 75% expected+ Writing - 50% expected+ Maths - 50% expected+ |
Reading - 76% expected+ Writing -70% expected+ Maths - 76% expected+ |
End of KS2 (2 children) |
Whilst these figures are not statistically relevant due to there only being 2 children, both attained expected or above in RWM with 1 out of the 2 attaining the higher scale score.
Maths average scaled score of 108.5 Reading average scaled score 108.5 GPS average scaled score – 110.5 |
Maths average scaled score nationally 105.4
Reading Average Scaled Score nationally 106.1
GPS average scaled score nationally– 107.2 |
In-house Data
GLD | Reading | Writing | Maths | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Expected+ | Exceeding | Expected+ | Exceeding | Expected+ | Exceeding | ||
End of Y1 Out of 39 (New child started) |
74% | 23% | 77% | 21% | 77% | 15% | ||
GLD | Reading | Writing | Maths | |||||
4 children Pupil Premium 3 FSM 1 |
Exp + | Exc | Expected+ | Exceeding | Expected+ | Exceeding | Expected+ | Exceeding |
75% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
Reading | Writing | Maths | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
End of Y3 (45 – 1 child started last week Y3) results based on 44 |
Expected + | Exceeding | Expected + | Exceeding | Expected + | Exceeding |
84% | 34% | 77% | 20% | 86% | 36% | |
Reading | Writing | Maths | ||||
Expected + | Exceeding | Expected + | Exceeding | Expected + | Exceeding | |
Pupil Premium 2 Children 1 more joined start of Y4 |
2/2 100% |
1/2 50% |
2/2 100% |
0 0% |
2/2 100% |
0 0% |
Reading | Writing | Maths | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
End of Y4 Percentage for 51 children 1 of whom is SEND |
Expected + | Exceeding | Expected + | Exceeding | Expected + | Exceeding |
78% | 37% | 71% | 22% | 82% | 33% | |
Reading | Writing | Maths | ||||
Expected + | Exceeding | Expected + | Exceeding | Expected + | Exceeding | |
Pupil Premium 13 Children | 61% | 15% | 61% | 8% | 61% | 23% |
|
Reading |
Writing |
Maths |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
End of Y5 49 children |
Expected + |
Exceeding |
Expected + |
Exceeding |
Expected + |
Exceeding |
||||||
38/49 76% |
10/49 20% |
39/49 80% |
13/49 26% |
41/49 83% |
5/49 10% |
|||||||
Pupil Premium 8 Children |
Reading |
Writing |
Maths |
|||||||||
Expected + |
Exceeding |
Expected + |
Exceeding |
Expected + |
Exceeding |
|||||||
5/8 63% |
1/8 13% |
6/8 75% |
1/8 13% |
4/8 50% |
0 0% |
Impact and effectiveness
Aims |
Action |
Cost (Rounded) |
Impact measure and effectiveness |
---|---|---|---|
To improve aspirations, confidence, self motivation and intrinsic reward. |
Growth Mindset training for all staff. Principles to be employed with children through classroom practice and direct teaching. |
£1,600 |
There have been raised aspirations which were indicated by pupil surveys and this is also shown in good and outstanding progress from starting points. |
To develop fluency and enjoyment of reading. Key focus groups Y4 & 5 |
Catch up literacy programme – in line with the curriculum 2014 |
£5,000 |
4 targeted children in year 5 all made accelerated progress from working towards to expected or from expected to exceeding.
4 targeted children from year 4 made good progress maintaining their prior attainment levels. |
To Improve spelling and handwriting Key focus children Y3-Y5 |
‘No-nonsense spelling’ scheme Targeted small group intervention auctioning programme created from EEF research – key focus on hearing and speaking segmented words combined with writing |
£4,000 Scheme, delivery of intervention. |
All children have improved their spelling and handwriting and this is shown in the quality of the work in presentation books |
Beat Dyslexia Spelling intervention |
In house data from the beat dyslexia program shows substantial progress. This is reflected in the children’s confidence to write and there is an improvement their spelling ability.
|
||
To develop children’s mathematical skills through an inclusive programme and same day interventions |
Staff training and resource materials for ‘Shanghai maths’
Staff to support delivery of same day interventions |
£3,000 training/cover costs. £1,500 supporting materials £4,000 to facilitate same day interventions. |
All children including, those with disadvantage, have made good or excellent progress in maths
See data tables above.
|
To ensure that children with multiple disadvantage have accurate diagnostic assessment leading to specific targets with accurate and focused provision |
Purchase of a range of diagnostic assessment, including PHAB, communication and language and Boxall profiling. Training of all teaching staff to carry these out. Staffing costs to assess and deliver provision. |
£2,000 from
£1,000
£6,000
(The additional costs of this focus will be shared with the SEN budget) |
The diagnostic assessments have led to fine tacking and target setting which has supported children with multiple disadvantage having clear targets set leading to good and outstanding progress. . |
To provide IT based packages to support learning in a fun and interactive manner, in the classroom and at home. |
Purchase of licences for: Nessy Mathletics |
£5000 |
Children have benefited from the IT packages purchased and this is shown in their progress and attainment. |
To support learning in the classroom |
Supporting salaries |
£15,000 |
Children have been engaged in lessons which have moved at a fast pace and learning maximised, Children have benefited from quick and effective feedback leading to maximising pupil progress against learning objectives. |
To ensure children continue to have access to a broad and balanced curriculum including extra-curricular learning in non core subjects to ensure that children of disadvantage have a well-rounded education and extended opportunity. |
This includes: Music tuition Educational trips and visits. |
£3000 |
Children have taken part in all aspects of school life offered to them, raising self- confidence, aspirations. Trips, performances and music tuition has led to rich experiences |
To provide aspiration and challenge clubs |
Lego Blog club Sporting clubs Reading club Fit and fun club |
£500 to cover resource costs. (low due to staff undertaking this in their own time.) |
Children have benefited from lunch time and after school clubs providing them with varied activities and experiences. |
To ensure that children with welfare needs are well supported. |
Access to ELSA support time |
Est. £3000 This may rise in response to children’s needs. |
Children have increased their motivation and concentration thanks to the access to ELSA. This has meant they are better focused and happy to learn in lessons, thus supporting progress. |
To continue to develop the schools robust tracking and monitoring system. |
Administrative costs |
£1,500 |
This has allowed the school to effectively monitor and track children’s progress and attainment and then highlight any gaps that children need diminishing. |